In Defense of Journalism Education

[You can support an updated version of this post on Medium. You can also send a donation.]

I have a degree in Journalism.  I am proud of that education, and the places it’s taken me.  I am also a rarity in journalism, I feel, as employers increasingly seem to value graduates with qualifications in political science, economics, perhaps history, and then maybe a graduate degree in Journalism. (or forgo it all together) Students are, sometimes jokingly, warned away from an undergraduate education in journalism or media studies because the craft of journalism is one honed, or not, through a career, and the basics can be picked up on the job.  No journalism degree is necessary, and in fact other specialties would be cherished more.

The debate over attending journalism school (J-School) is not new, and I feel the proponents for the degree are being outnumbered.  Journalism training Mecca, the Poynter Institute, recently aggregated four recent arguments against a journalism degree. I understand the profession is changing, and I understand technology is evolving at a pace faster than many media outlets can handle effectively, but there are certain basics picked up in the journalistic test-kitchen of a university which are disappearing by the lack of emphasis on a journalism education.  And the profession, public, and society are suffering because of it.

The benefit of an education depends a lot on the educators and facilities available, but I think it is fair to say journalism programs are mostly similar in that they teach basics of news judgement (5 W’S, what makes a story news), of how to construct a news story, how to think critically about topics or types of media manipulation, and a taste of doing the real thing.  Internships, school papers or stations, practical coursework, all give a budding journalist time to–well–practice.  Those early years are supposed to be a time during which a student can screw up and not be relegated to a minor market out of a professional disgrace.  I have been fortunate to experience much in my young career, and I feel my education provided a head-start and hard lessons with a soft landing.  It was in college I was given the straight opinion of a newspaper city editor who bled red ink onto my stories until I produced something passable.  It was where I first experienced a CD malfunction while hosting a radio program, and heard the deafening silence of dead air.  It was where I interviewed local politicians, and had a certain buffer zone between my inexperience and their egos.

Is this protected environment worth tens of thousands of dollars in college debt?  No.  But the skyrocketing costs of education are a problem for all professions, and more and more PHDs are earning pittance.  Journalists, at least a certain breed of them, live the news and love to serve communities.  Within that breed of journalist there are two other types: those hungry for the scoop, and breathing breaking news; and those who want to analyze themes, and tell stories.  I lean more to the latter.  The common link between the two types is a sense of duty, and a pride (ego) in participating in the discourse between people and newsmakers.  A journalism education provides the framework for that passion.  As I detailed in my report on the German mediascape, a lack of trained journalists has left some editorial staffs with folks dedicated to a specialty or cause, instead of to the news and the function of a journalist in society.

Bush House, former home of the BBC


Is journalism going the way of the dodo?

There are of course exceptions to any defense I could offer for getting a journalism education.  But as a practitioner of knowledge myself, I find this the most compelling:  one of the arguments against journalism school named in the Poynter page was that some editors need multi-talented staffers, and skills can be picked up on the job.  There is always a little training when starting a new job, but some things should have been taught and mastered before a staffer enters a newsroom.  A journalist should know how to write a basic news story–structure, news pegs, and with some style.  (style is subjective, but there should be some!)  A journalist should know how to seek and find information–in the age of Google, this means more than using Google.  A journalist should know how to conduct an interview, ask questions, and be critical.  A journalist should know how to read the news, and how to relate topics to broader audiences.  It is true many of these things can be picked up on the job, but why should an employer be burdened with taking on a green employee with no experience.  Even a four-year degree of mini-failures can mature a young journalist enough to be that much more ready for prime-time in a newsroom.

Choosing what to study, and where to spend a fair chunk of one’s life, are not easy decisions.  But for someone who wishes to be a solid journalist, I think having a journalism degree is a fine investment.  I would agree, that hybrid programs, combining an academic specialty, or IT training, would be beneficial.  But the core journalism classes, and practical experience, can provide skills that are vital in a newsroom, and over time, separate types of journalists.

In an age of punditry, and 24-hour news cycles, and an overload of garbage passing for information, I cannot believe fellow journalists think we need fewer folks trained in news judgement, ethics, and the sense of civic responsibility which make for a quality fourth estate.  As is increasingly apparent, in the U.S. and elsewhere, when the quality of media suffers, democracy also suffers, because the public square becomes intellectually impaired; outnumbered by appeals to emotion.

It is okay to demand more from journalism.  And what I would like to see more of, are the basic skills needed to fulfill the profession’s noble task.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.